Close

1. Identity statement
Reference TypeJournal Article
Sitemtc-m21b.sid.inpe.br
Holder Codeisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Identifier8JMKD3MGP3W34P/3L9LLEL
Repositorysid.inpe.br/mtc-m21b/2016/03.03.16.51   (restricted access)
Last Update2016:03.03.16.53.54 (UTC) simone
Metadata Repositorysid.inpe.br/mtc-m21b/2016/03.03.16.51.05
Metadata Last Update2018:06.04.02.40.36 (UTC) administrator
DOI10.1016/j.future.2015.07.005
ISSN0167-739X
Citation KeyArcanjoLuzFazeRamo:2016:MeEvVo
TitleMethods for evaluating volunteers’ contributions in a deforestation detection citizen science project
Year2016
MonthMar.
Access Date2024, May 18
Type of Workjournal article
Secondary TypePRE PI
Number of Files1
Size6800 KiB
2. Context
Author1 Arcanjo, Jeferson de Souza
2 Luz, Eduardo F. P.
3 Fazenda, Álvaro L.
4 Ramos, Fernando Manuel
Resume Identifier1
2
3
4 8JMKD3MGP5W/3C9JH4A
Group1 DPI-OBT-INPE-MCTI-GOV-BR
2
3
4 LAC-CTE-INPE-MCTI-GOV-BR
Affiliation1 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
2 National Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters (Cemaden)
3 Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
4 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
Author e-Mail Address1 jeferson@dpi.inpe.br
2
3
4 fernando.ramos@inpe.br
JournalFuture Generation Computer Systems
Volume56
Pages550-557
Secondary MarkA1_ENGENHARIAS_III A2_SAÚDE_COLETIVA A2_INTERDISCIPLINAR A2_ENGENHARIAS_IV A2_CIÊNCIA_DA_COMPUTAÇÃO B1_MEDICINA_I B1_CIÊNCIAS_SOCIAIS_APLICADAS_I
History (UTC)2016-03-03 16:51:05 :: simone -> administrator ::
2016-06-04 05:08:16 :: administrator -> simone :: 2016
2016-06-20 12:53:20 :: simone -> administrator :: 2016
2018-06-04 02:40:36 :: administrator -> simone :: 2016
3. Content and structure
Is the master or a copy?is the master
Content Stagecompleted
Transferable1
Content TypeExternal Contribution
Version Typepublisher
KeywordsCitizen science
Data analysis and validation
Forest monitoring
AbstractToday, due to the availability of free remote sensing data, efficient algorithms for image classification and increased connectivity and computing power, together with international policy initiatives, such as the United Nations Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (UN-REDD), more and more countries are investing in their own national forest monitoring schemes. However, tropical forests remain under threat worldwide. Recently, a citizen science project that enables citizens around the globe to be involved in forest monitoring tasks has been proposed, called ForestWatchers (www.forestwatchers.net). Its main goal is to allow volunteers (many of them with no scientific training) around the globe, with their own smartphones, tablets and notebooks, review satellite images of forested regions and confirm whether automatic assignments of forested and deforested regions are correct. Inspected images are then sent to a central database where the results are integrated to generate up-to-date deforestation maps. This approach offers a low-cost way to both strengthen the scientific infrastructure and engage members of the public in science. Here, we describe the methods developed within the scope of the ForestWatchers project to assess the volunteers performance. These tools have been evaluated with data of two of the projects preliminary tasks. The first, called BestTile, asks volunteers to select which of several images of the same area has the least cloud cover, while in the second, called Deforestation, volunteers draw polygons on satellite images delimiting areas they believe have been deforested. The results from more than 500 volunteers show that using simple statistical tests, it is possible to achieve a triple goal: to increase the overall efficiency of the data collecting tasks by reducing the required number of volunteers per task, to identify malicious behavior and outliers, and to motivate volunteers to continue their contributions.
AreaSRE
Arrangement 1urlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção anterior à 2021 > DIDPI > Methods for evaluating...
Arrangement 2urlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção anterior à 2021 > LABAC > Methods for evaluating...
doc Directory Contentaccess
source Directory Contentthere are no files
agreement Directory Content
agreement.html 03/03/2016 13:51 1.0 KiB 
4. Conditions of access and use
Languageen
Target Filearcanjo_methods.pdf
User Groupsimone
Reader Groupadministrator
simone
Visibilityshown
Read Permissiondeny from all and allow from 150.163
Update Permissionnot transferred
5. Allied materials
Mirror Repositoryurlib.net/www/2011/03.29.20.55
Next Higher Units8JMKD3MGPCW/3EQCCU5
8JMKD3MGPCW/3ESGTTP
Citing Item Listsid.inpe.br/bibdigital/2013/09.09.15.05 12
sid.inpe.br/bibdigital/2013/09.22.23.14 4
DisseminationWEBSCI; PORTALCAPES; COMPENDEX; SCOPUS.
Host Collectionsid.inpe.br/mtc-m21b/2013/09.26.14.25.20
6. Notes
Empty Fieldsalternatejournal archivingpolicy archivist callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel e-mailaddress format isbn label lineage mark nextedition notes number orcid parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarykey session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark tertiarytype url
7. Description control
e-Mail (login)simone
update 


Close